the Italian registry legislation based on the fundamental principle of usual residence, but this principle can not, of course, apply for a permanent home who did not have as is the case with many fulltimers that sell or permanently leave their homes to live in camper and have no relatives or friends where to register your address or for other reasons do not like it, which is why the legislators in the registry on the inclusion of homeless people, has recourse to the principle of domicile. In practice, this particular category of people choose where to be registered at the municipality and the municipality will provide enrollment in a way that does not exist, specially invented. all seem very simple, but unfortunately showed a particularly difficult situation, characterized, in many cases, the denial of the right of the homeless registry entry. The confirmation of this disturbing situation has come to the councilor and family social services the town of Turin, Stefano Lepri, who recently said that recognition of the fictitious residence for homeless people, is a principle of civilization, often denied by the conduct of local government that shows little knowledge of the rules in force. How has clarified the Cassation, United Civil Sections, no 449, , 19.6.2000, to be registered concession is not an act, but is a right for citizens and an obligation on the registrar. However, while the normal requirements for entry registry are subjective, but also objective because the residence is the place of usual residence and in the same place is required to be registered for the homeless, that is the only subjective criterion that, as mentioned, concretized in the discretion of the person concerned. The Court of Milan, in Case No. 10257 of 2.6.2003 on just a case of denied residency to the homeless person, he says quote: The district, which official of the Government, is only required to give effect to the rules governing the matter, so that in-Chief citizen applicant, if all the conditions, you configure a real right subject to registration . There is unfortunately a situation of widespread illegality in the conduct of many municipalities, with blame equally divided between social services and municipal authorities. This is not the question of the different modes of birth registration, which was not covered by existing legislation, but it must be denounce the immorality of many organizations, especially large cities, which place restrictions and obstacles to birth registration of citizens homeless . This behavior no legal legitimacy. The registrar will, defend themselves by denouncing the attempt to spread from people who have problems with creditors or otherwise, to pretend they have no habitual residence in order to qualify to be registered in a way that does not exist and therefore be difficult to find. The pathological aspect of the problem can not influence the actions of public officials in front of citizens who hold effective rights and legally protected.
(Please post in the comments section below, your experience on this.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment